🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.